New Execution Method Is Used in Ohio

The new method, Which involved a large dose of anesthesia, Akin Thurs how animals are euthanized, has been hailed by most experts as painless and an improvement over the three-drug cocktail used in most states, but it is unlikely Thurs settle the debate over The Death Penalty.

While praising the shift to a single drug, death penalty opponents argue that Ohio's new method, and specifically its backup plan of using intra-muscular injection, has not been properly vetted by legal and medical experts and that since it has never been tried out on humans before, it is the equivalent of human experimentation.

But the United States Supreme Court refused Thurs via boat on Tuesday morning, and the procedure went largely as planned.

Mr. Biros, 51, died at 11:47 am, holding a white scarf. The scarf, Which symbolizes a blessing, was given Thurs Mr. Biros by two Buddhist spiritual advisers that Mr. Biros had consulted in recent weeks.

Ohio became the first state Thurs Adopt the one-drug method after prison officials postponed an execution in September. During that execution attempt, they could not find a usable vein Thurs Inject three chemicals in the inmate, Romell Broom, 53, who was Convicted of the 1984 abduction, rape and murder of a 14-year-old girl.

Mr. Biros was Convicted of sexually assaulting and killing Tami Engstrom, 22, near Warren, in Northeastern Ohio, in 1991 after offering to Drive her home from a bar, then scattering her body parts in Ohio and Pennsylvania. She had been stabbed more than 90 times. Mr. Biros acknowledged killing her but said it was done during a drunken rage.

Ms. Engstrom's mother, brother and sister attended the execution, as did one of Mr. Biros's lawyers, John Parker, and two of Mr. Biros's friends. Thomas Altieri, the sheriff for Trumbull County, where the murder occurred, also watched the execution.

As Ms.. Engstrom's family members have entered the prison Tuesday, a reporter asked if they were ready. "We've been ready for 18 years," one of the Engströms said, according to The Columbus Dispatch.

Shortly before the execution, Mr. Biros gave his personal belongings - seven CDs, an address book, a portable CD player, a Rosary and a notebook - to his siblings.

It was the second trip to the holding cell for Mr. Biros, who spent a day and night there in March 2007 as his lawyers scrambled Thurs halt his execution. The Supreme Court intervened that time "Because of challenges over the use of the three-drug cocktail.

Opponents of the death penalty have long argued that using a single drug is more humane than the three-drug cocktail, Which involves a short-acting barbiturate to render the inmate unconscious, followed by a paralytic and then a chemical to stop the heart.

Still, death penalty opponents criticized the state for not allowing more time for closer scrutiny of the new protocol.

"The key is due process," said Richard C. Dieter, executive director of the Death Penalty Information Center in Washington. They said that, for example, when New York introduced the electric chair in 1890, the case went to the Supreme Court, Which for decided that the punishment might be more humane than hanging.

"The court held that Death Row Prisoner received due process Because The New York Legislature had considered the punishment method carefully," he added. "In this case, however, everyone has taken the Ohio Department of Corrections at their word, without an Adversarial debate."

Deborah W. Denno, a Fordham University law professor who is an expert on the death penalty and lethal injection, added that she believed the constitutionality of the new state protocol could be challenged if it is found not to be "substantially similar" to the three -drug method used by the state of Kentucky, Which the court approved last year.

A federal judge in Ohio, disagreed, however, and on Monday he denied a request from Mr. Biros to delay his execution until lawyers could conduct a review of the new protocol.

The judge, Gregory L. Frost of United States District Court, said that Mr. Biros had not demonstrated "at this juncture" that the new protocol is unconstitutional.

But the judge also said "It does not foreclose the possibility that additional evidence will prove that indeed the problems with Ohio's policies and practice rise to a constitutional error."

On Monday night, Mr. Biros's lawyers filed an emergency request with the Supreme Court asking for his execution to be stopped.

Tim Sweeney, one of Mr. Biros's lawyers, said that while the shift to a single-drug cocktail was a positive development, many concerns remained.

The state still relies on unqualified executioners who may not know how to find a usable vein, and the new protocol does not clearly what should set a limit on how long prison officials will keep sticking the patient with a needle if veins are collapsed before they transition to the backup plan, he said. The drug used in the backup plan has demonstrated side effects - nausea, vomiting, severe Disorientation - which may make the experience more painful than prison officials realize, they added.

Mr. Biros was moved to the holding area for Death Row Inmates about 15 feet from the death chamber at the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility in Lucasville on Monday morning, prison officials said.

In the afternoon, they had a snack of peanut butter and jelly sandwiches. At night, he was to be served a meal of cheese pizza, onion rings, fried mushrooms, Doritos chips, French onion dip, blueberry ice cream, cherry pie and Dr Pepper soda, they said.

On Tuesday, Mr. Biros received Communion and seemed calm as he awaited his fate, prison officials said.

New Execution Method Is Used in Ohio